|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
... Bush’s energy policy of allowing oil drilling in Alaska’s National Artic Wildlife Refuge benefit and boost our economy or will it lead to social costs that destroy the wildlife of the Refuge? This issue of drilling oil in Alaska has been a huge debate between President George W. ... President Bush supports drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge and wants to let Oil Company’s drill on 1. ... 3 million-acre refuge. However, Environmentalists object to such a plan, saying the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) should be left unspoiled.
Americans are divided on the issue, with some polls reporting that slightly more people oppose drilling than favor it. Environmentalists and Democrats say that there is not enough oil in the Refuge to risk damaging ANWR’s fragile land and wildlife. They feel that the drilling will disrupt the area’s ecosystem and the feeding, migratory and reproductive patterns of hundreds of species, including polar bears, musk oxen, migratory birds and some of the 130,000 caribou.
Approximate Word count = 720
Approximate Pages = 2.9
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|