Rawls Veil of Ignorance
- This is a preview of the essay.
To view the full text you must login!
Rawls theory of justice revolves around the
adaptation of two fundamental principles of justice which would, in turn,
guarantee a just and morally acceptable society. The first principle
guarantees the right of each person to have the most extensive basic
liberty compatible with the liberty of others. The second principle states
that social and economic positions are to be a) to everyone's advantage
and b) open to all. A key problem to Rawls is to show how such
principles would be universally adopted and here the work borders on
general ethical issues. He introduces a theoretical "veil of ignorance"
in which all the "players" in the social game would be placed in a
situation which is called the "original position". Having only a general
knowledge of the facts of "life and society", each player is to abide
based on their moral obligation. By denying the players any specific
information about themselves it forces them to adopt a generalized point
of view that bears a strong resemblance to the moral point of view.
"Moral conclusions can be reached without abandoning the prudential
standpoint of positing, a moral outlook merely by pursuing one's own
prudential reasoning under certain procedural bargaining and knowledge
constraints." Rawls proposes that the most reasonable principles of
justice for a society are those that individuals would themselves agree to
behind the "veil of ignorance", in circumstances in which each is
represented as a moral person, endowed with the basic moral powers. What
this position supports is that while each person has different ends and
goals, different backgrounds and talents, each ought to have a fair chance
to develop his or her talents and to pursue those goals - fair equality
for opportunity...