|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
...
In the ‘90s, a website posted the names and addresses of abortionists, calling them “The Nuremburg Files.” The site crossed out the names of abortionists that were killed, making a hit list. Five doctors sued the website saying that it was threatening their privacy and their lives. ...
One can see from the excerpt that there are people who have a strong hatred for abortionists and who would go to any extent to stop abortions from taking place. Therefore, publishing addresses and names of abortionists when it puts their lives in danger is unconstitutional. ... Anti-abortionists need to protest abortion laws through legislation not violence. ... We do not believe that anti-abortionists should not protest abortion; we believe, however, that abortionists’ lives should not be threatened by websites that post their names and addresses. ...
The question reads, “Should Right to Life organizations have the right to publish the names and addresses of abortionists when doing so would put those doctors lives in danger? ... Slepian should tell us all that it is time to put an end to this invasion of privacy.
Approximate Word count = 852
Approximate Pages = 3.4
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|