|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
JOB EVALUATION
Morgeson, F. ...
Job evaluation is a systematic process for determining how “big” jobs is, primarily to decide how much to pay. ... Some believe that substantial employee participation in the job evaluation process is necessary to improve employee pay satisfaction. ... The study points out weaknesses in the job evaluation literature that’s available. The researchers believe that there is a lack of research investigating the question of how job evaluation participation influences pay satisfaction. ...
H2: Satisfaction with pay structure and administration will increase following
A job evaluation implementation, while satisfaction with benefits will be unaffected. ... The Roles of Departmental and Position Power
In job evaluation. ... Their goal was to support their hypothesis that job evaluation outcomes were affected by departmental power. They also wanted to prove that the positive effect of departmental power on favorable job evaluation outcomes will be greater when the position power of the jobs being upgraded or requested is high rather than low. ... After studying forty departments over a six year time frame the research strongly supports the hypothesis of the researchers’ that departmental power has a significant affect on the outcome of job evaluation. ... Some would say that because job evaluation can be affected by powerful departments the fundamental assumptions of job evaluation should be questioned. ... (1993) An Assessment of the Construct Validity of
Three Job Evaluation Methods: A Field Experiment. ... The act states that when evaluating the worth of a job four attributes must be considered. They are skill, responsibility, effort required for the job and working conditions. The basis of this article deals with the assumption that none of the job evaluation methods available ensure that the four attributes are addressed. In order to support this hypotheses Collins and Muchinsky conducted a study which examined the major issues: the extent to which three common job evaluation systems measure the worth of a job as required by the Equal Pay Act of 1963. If convergent and discriminational evidence provides a basis for contracts interpretation and finally is it correct to use the same job evaluation method for all classifications.
Approximate Word count = 1689
Approximate Pages = 6.8
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|