123 School Work

HOME F.A.Q. REGISTER LOGIN SEARCH  
Essay Topics
Acceptance
Art
Business
Custom Written
Direct Essays
English
Example Essays
Foreign
History
Medical
Mega Essays
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Pre-Written
Religion
Science
Search
Speeches
Sports
Technology
Over 101,000 Essays and Term Papers!!

Featured Papers from RadEssays

1. Tim Leary
2. Sensoring Pornography On The Internet
3. Heart Of Darkness And Apocalypse Now
4. Sex In The Media
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login

United States v Playboy


     The Playboy Company, which primarily deals with sexually explicit adult material, has numerous television outlets. ... Playboy television is provided by the Spice Entertainment Companies, Inc. ...
     The plaintiffs of this case were the United States of America, Janet Reno, Attorney General, the United States Department of Justice, and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The defendants were Playboy Entertainment Group Inc. ...
     Playboy filed its case on February 26, 1996 “seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the operation of Section 505. The complaint alleged that Section 505 violates Playboy’s rights under the First Amendment and the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment” (USDOJ 5). The First Amendment states that, “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.” Playboy believed that the Communications Decency Act section 505 limited their right to free speech because it was now censored. ...
     On November 8, 1996, the district court of Delaware denied Playboy and Spice a motion for a preliminary (summary) judgment. ... The court said that time channeling was extremely restrictive because 30%-50% of Playboy’s viewers viewed prior to 10 pm. ... The order did not contain any requirement that Playboy include “adequate notice” provisions in its contracts with cable operators. Nor did it limit the scope of the injunction to Playboy, which is the only programmer of sexually explicit broadcasting that remains a party to this lawsuit” (USDOJ 7). ... The first was to change the judgment to apply only to Playboy. ... ”
     “On March 18, 1999, the district court dismissed the government’s two motions, stating that it “lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate these motions due to subsequent filing of Defentants’ notice of appeal to the United States Supreme Court” (USDOJ 7).


Approximate Word count = 1222
Approximate Pages = 4.9
(250 words per page double spaced)
Over 101,000 Essays and Term Papers!!
Links
Relations with the United States

hugh hefner as an american playboy and reformer

United States et al v Playboy Entertainment Group Inc

hugh hefner as an american playboy and reformer

Playboy of the Western World

Playboy Advisor review

Support
F.A.Q.
Custom Essays
Payment
123 School Work
Forgot Password?
Activation Email
More Links
All Papers Are For Research And Reference Purposes Only! You may not turn these papers in as your own! You must cite our web site as your source!
Copyright 2003-2008 123schoolwork.com. All rights reserved.